# Sony vs Panasonic vs Sharp vs Yamaha

> Unit: JPY millions (ratios in %)
> Periods: Sony = FY ending Mar 2026, consolidated, IFRS / Panasonic = FY ending Mar 2026, consolidated, IFRS / Sharp = FY ending Mar 2026, consolidated, J-GAAP / Yamaha = FY ending Mar 2026, consolidated, IFRS
> Retrieved: 2026-09-30T18:28:48.022Z

| Metric | Sony | Panasonic | Sharp | Yamaha |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Revenue | 12,479,620 | 8,048,722 | 1,892,811 | 465,330 |
| Operating income | 1,447,507 | 236,407 | 48,565 | 29,274 |
| Net income | -326,865 | 189,540 | 47,434 | 23,720 |
| COGS ratio | 69.2% | 68.6% | 77.8% | 62.4% |
| Operating margin | 11.6% | 2.9% | 2.6% | 6.3% |
| Net margin | -2.6% | 2.4% | 2.5% | 5.1% |
| FCF margin | 11.9% | -0.9% | -1.8% | 6.8% |
| Period | FY ending Mar 2026 | FY ending Mar 2026 | FY ending Mar 2026 | FY ending Mar 2026 |
| Source | S100YE2C | S100YETA | S100YHZV | S100YJE7 |

## Five-axis industry profile

Each axis shows a rank within that company's primary industry, so peer groups may differ. Missing values are labeled unavailable; no combined score is calculated. Industry rank is not an investment recommendation.

| Axis | Sony | Panasonic | Sharp | Yamaha |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Revenue growth | 81.9 (36 peers) | 31.8 (11 peers) | 4.2 (12 peers) | 40.9 (11 peers) |
| Profitability | 67.1 (41 peers) | 46.4 (14 peers) | 4.5 (11 peers) | 62.5 (12 peers) |
| Cash conversion | 66.1 (31 peers) | 86.4 (11 peers) | 4.5 (11 peers) | 61.1 (9 peers) |
| Efficiency | 28 (41 peers) | 17.9 (14 peers) | 95.8 (12 peers) | 37.5 (12 peers) |
| Financial strength | — | — | — | — |

## Company details

- https://vizora.meequs.com/en/company/sony-group/md
- https://vizora.meequs.com/en/company/panasonic-holdings/md
- https://vizora.meequs.com/en/company/sharp/md
- https://vizora.meequs.com/en/company/yamaha/md

## Definitions

- Amounts are in millions of JPY (rounded). The period is stated in each table heading
- Operating margin = operating income ÷ revenue. Net income is attributable to owners of the parent when disclosed
- Free cash flow (FCF) = operating cash flow − capital expenditure
- ¥100 model = breakdown per ¥100 of revenue (rounded so parts sum to 100)
- Segment revenues include inter-segment sales and may not sum to consolidated revenue
- Source IDs are EDINET document IDs (docID). "算出" (derived) means computed from other disclosed values
- All figures are extracted mechanically from filings. AI-written text never generates figures
- Source: company filings submitted to EDINET (Financial Services Agency of Japan). Figures were extracted, edited and processed, and charts and text were created, by Vizora — not by the FSA (used under the Public Data License v1.0).