# Alsok vs Amvis Holdings vs Gakken Holdings vs Sompo Holdings

> Unit: JPY millions (ratios in %)
> Periods: Alsok = FY ending Mar 2026, consolidated, J-GAAP / Amvis Holdings = FY ending Sep 2025, consolidated, J-GAAP / Gakken Holdings = FY ending Sep 2025, consolidated, J-GAAP / Sompo Holdings = FY ending Mar 2026, consolidated, IFRS
> Retrieved: 2026-09-30T21:23:49.341Z

| Metric | Alsok | Amvis Holdings | Gakken Holdings | Sompo Holdings |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Revenue | 597,026 | 49,174 | 199,119 | 5,372,921 |
| Operating income | 46,919 | 6,162 | 8,237 | — |
| Net income | 33,262 | 3,660 | 3,578 | 640,086 |
| COGS ratio | 76.0% | 69.9% | 72.4% | — |
| Operating margin | 7.9% | 12.5% | 4.1% | — |
| Net margin | 5.6% | 7.4% | 1.8% | 11.9% |
| FCF margin | 2.5% | -8.9% | 2.1% | 12.0% |
| Period | FY ending Mar 2026 | FY ending Sep 2025 | FY ending Sep 2025 | FY ending Mar 2026 |
| Source | S100Y7EC | S100XD1A | S100XKOH | S100YC6Z |

## Five-axis industry profile

Each axis shows a rank within that company's primary industry, so peer groups may differ. Missing values are labeled unavailable; no combined score is calculated. Industry rank is not an investment recommendation.

| Axis | Alsok | Amvis Holdings | Gakken Holdings | Sompo Holdings |
| --- | ---: | ---: | ---: | ---: |
| Revenue growth | 50 (7 peers) | 96.7 (15 peers) | 51.9 (26 peers) | — |
| Profitability | 78.6 (7 peers) | 97.6 (21 peers) | 21.7 (30 peers) | — |
| Cash conversion | 50 (7 peers) | 34.2 (19 peers) | 44.6 (28 peers) | — |
| Efficiency | 21.4 (7 peers) | 11.9 (21 peers) | 78.3 (30 peers) | — |
| Financial strength | 12.5 (4 peers) | — | 16.7 (3 peers) | — |

## Company details

- https://vizora.meequs.com/en/company/alsok/md
- https://vizora.meequs.com/en/company/amvis-holdings/md
- https://vizora.meequs.com/en/company/gakken-holdings/md
- https://vizora.meequs.com/en/company/sompo-holdings/md

## Definitions

- Amounts are in millions of JPY (rounded). The period is stated in each table heading
- Operating margin = operating income ÷ revenue. Net income is attributable to owners of the parent when disclosed
- Free cash flow (FCF) = operating cash flow − capital expenditure
- ¥100 model = breakdown per ¥100 of revenue (rounded so parts sum to 100)
- Segment revenues include inter-segment sales and may not sum to consolidated revenue
- Source IDs are EDINET document IDs (docID). "算出" (derived) means computed from other disclosed values
- All figures are extracted mechanically from filings. AI-written text never generates figures
- Source: company filings submitted to EDINET (Financial Services Agency of Japan). Figures were extracted, edited and processed, and charts and text were created, by Vizora — not by the FSA (used under the Public Data License v1.0).